approaches-to-equityEquity for Children initiated the Approaches to Equity study in 2013 to investigate views about the concept of equity by leaders of international organizations, foundations and research institutions.  By analyzing key institutional reports and conducting interviews with senior-level professionals of international organizations as well as researchers and foundations, the findings set the stage for a common understanding of equity and contain recommendations for policy makers, practitioners and researchers. These stakeholder perspectives respond to the question: How is equity perceived by the international development community and what does it mean going forward? 

While there is broad consensus among stakeholders about using the equity approach to address extreme poverty, distinctions exist in the interpretation and implications of equity and how to attain it.  A common understanding of equity’s meaning is essential, for it provides a framework for collaboration across sectors — among politicians, policymakers and practitioners who will utilize these ideas to address the ultimate goal of greater equity around the world for all.  The equity approach provides a shared vision for government, civil society (non governmental organizations and groups of organized citizens), academia and all stakeholders.

Equity involves redressing systems so that they are more inclusive.  It is broadly defined in terms of fairness and avoidance of unnecessary deprivations.  Both these characteristics involve circumstances that individuals are born into such as economic status, place of birth, race and gender. 

Inequity is frequently manifested as barriers to accessing services.  The most cited reason to pursue an equity agenda is to realize human rights.  Other outcomes of the equity approach include improving economic growth, cost efficiency, sustainability and social cohesion.  At its heart, the equity approach addresses the needs of people who suffer from multiple, overlapping deprivations—those who are the worst off.  This calls for an inter-sectoral approach that addresses needs holistically.  A majority of study respondents describe the strongest demographic priorities as children living in poverty, the most vulnerable segments of society and early childhood.  This view reflects the fact that children are disproportionately vulnerable to disadvantages and deprivations.  Within the most excluded groups, respondents note, children reached in early childhood have the greatest potential to avoid long lasting deprivations and thereby end the cycle of poverty.

 

Key Recommendations

The following 10 recommendations are based on the findings of this study and shall provide inputs for government, civil society (non governmental organizations and groups of organized citizens), and the private sector on equity based policy making and programming:

  1. Ensure that policiesand interventions explicitly include the most excluded and disadvantaged populations and put children at the center.  Investing in children living in poverty from an early age on is the best investment in order to break the cycle of poverty.
  2. Prioritize community based and context based approaches rather than top down “one size fits all” processes in programming, monitoring and policymaking.
  3. Incorporate the equity lens for evidence based programming and policy, which requires the systematic collection of disaggregated data by sex, age, race, ethnicity, income, location and disability.
  4. Advocate the equity approach and participation by the most vulnerable and disadvantaged populations in planning, implementation and monitoring of programs and policies, particularly the voices and concerns of children and youth.  They are not only beneficiaries but also agents for social change.
  5. Invest in inclusive social protection strategies as a key component of social policy, as it will improve the lives of the worst off, giving positive outcomes to children.
  6. Focus on policies and programs for poverty reduction and equity and, simultaneously, address macroeconomic structures through progressive taxation, anti-corruption measures, illicit financial transfers and tax evasion.
  7. Establish holistic, life-long responses and inter-sectoral policy approaches that address multi-dimensional and overlapping deprivations experienced by children.
  8. Develop measurable goals in order to monitor progress that narrows social and economic gaps between the least and most advantaged children.  Expand long term evaluations and longitudinal studies.
  9. Incorporate an equity lens into institutional, organizational and policy frameworks, much as has been done about gender in the last decades.  This requires intensive investment in capacity building within organizations and governments about equity-based programs, policies and using the equity lens.
  10. Develop a cohesive terminology of equity’s key components for a shared understanding among stakeholders working toward equity.

Copy Final Report 04.28.15

 
Read the full report here.

 



Leave a Reply

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Equity for Children is an initiative of the Graduate Program of International Affairs (GPIA) at The New School in New York City. Our organization strives to advance an agenda of social justice, human rights and social equality for children worldwide in order to strengthen children’s well being by diminishing child poverty, marginalization and inequality.